Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Clement Tabur vs Guy Den Heijer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tabur vs Heijer analysis and find out who is favored!
Clement Tabur vs Guy Den Heijer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Tabur 1 - 0 Heijer
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tabur has won 47.52% of points on their second serve, while Heijer has won 48.73%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tabur, in recent form, has won 51.91% of their opponent's second serve points, while Heijer has won 50.47%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.84% and 28.28% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tabur has saved 60.71% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Heijer has saved 58.97% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tabur has won 65.82% of matches played (W/L 52/ 27), with Heijer winning 56.45% (W/L 35/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tabur has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 73/ 36), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 46% (W/L 29/ 34). Heijer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 90/ 59), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Tabur has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 81.4% of matches (W/L 35/ 8), where as Heijer has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.45% of matches (W/L 35/ 27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tabur winning 1 times and Heijer being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Tabur winning 2 and Heijer winning 0. The last match between Tabur and Heijer was at the M25 Lesa, 24-08-2023, Second, Clay with Clement Tabur getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:15:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tabur and Heijer have played a deciding set 0 times, with Tabur winning 0 times and Heijer 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Tabur winning 0, and Heijer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tabur has played against opponents with an average rank of 268.2 while Heijer has played against players with an average rank of 108.98.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tabur has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Heijer has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tabur has converted 35.94% of breakpoint opportunities, and Heijer has converted 39.56% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
234
Rank
202
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
865
Rank
751
High
27
Age
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
61% (241-156)
Career Total W/L
59% (214-151)
48% (13-14)
YTD W/L
53% (9-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Clement Tabur | Guy Den Heijer |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:15:0 | 1:15:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (28/46) | 49% (22/45) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (21/28) | 73% (16/22) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 83% (15/18) | 43% (10/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (19/45) | 22% (10/46) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats 
Clement Tabur
Player
Guy Den Heijer
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
4
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
16 of
22)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Clement Tabur | Guy Den Heijer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 48% (13/14) | 53% (9/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 47% (28/31) | 49% (18/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (284/277) | 49% (189/198) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) | 67% (4/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 54% (13/11) | 43% (3/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.26 | 0.26 |
| Aces Total | 70 | 50 |
| DFs per game | 0.37 | 0.13 |
| DFs Total | 99 | 24 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:58 | 1:22:24 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 250.59 | 79.18 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1127/1832) | 66% (675/1025) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (752/1127) | 67% (449/675) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (335/705) | 46% (160/350) |
| BPs Won% Total | 36% (78/217) | 42% (32/76) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (773/1860) | 37% (362/970) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 44% (7/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (6/2) | 53% (9/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 48% (13/27) | 50% (8/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 71% (5/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 60% (3/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (11/11) | 100% (5/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (11/0) | 0% (5/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (16/2) | 27% (11/3) |
Clement Tabur Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Clement Tabur
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Clement Tabur
66%
(
59 of
89)
1st Serve %
54%
(
58 of
108)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
50 of
108)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
52%
(
44 of
84)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Marco Cecchinato
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
2
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Clement Tabur
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Clement Tabur
59%
(
69 of
117)
1st Serve %
51%
(
54 of
105)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
53 of
69)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
46%
(
22 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
36%
(
42 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
105)
117
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(4) 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Victor Lilov
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Clement Tabur
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
7
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yibing Wu
Player
Clement Tabur
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefano Travaglia
Player
Clement Tabur
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
4 of
29)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Guy Den Heijer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Elliot Benchetrit
Player
Guy Den Heijer
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Guy Den Heijer
Player
Mihai Razvan Marinescu
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
58
|
1-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Guy Den Heijer
Player
Samuil Konov
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mischa Lanz
Player
Guy Den Heijer
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
73%
(
57 of
78)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
34 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
82
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pavel Verbin
Player
Guy Den Heijer
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Freek Van Donselaar
Player
Guy Den Heijer
57%
(
50 of
87)
1st Serve %
71%
(
66 of
93)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
46 of
66)
68%
(
25 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(4) 4-6 15-13 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(4) 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Sergey Fomin
Player
Guy Den Heijer
60%
(
76 of
126)
1st Serve %
62%
(
72 of
117)
2
Aces
6
8
Double Faults
4
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
51 of
72)
42%
(
21 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
51 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
47 of
117)
122
Total Points Won
121
|
6-3 6-7(3) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Guy Den Heijer
Player
Aliaksandr Liaonenka
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
9
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Tabur Vs Heijer Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
